ELECTRODIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE VALUES FOR ULNAR MOTOR NERVE CONDUCTION RECORDED FROM THE FLEXOR CARPI ULNARIS MUSCLE

Authors

  • Chanasak Hathaiareerug Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Hemmarat Pareesri Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand
  • Chanwit Phongamwong Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Phramongkutklao Hospital and Phramongkutklao College of Medicine, Bangkok, Thailand

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55374/jseamed.v10.310

Keywords:

electrodiagnosis, nerve conduction study, ulnar nerve, reference values, flexor carpi ulnaris

Abstract

Background: Ulnar nerve entrapment at the elbow is the second most common compressive neuropathy of the upper extremity. The flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) muscle may improve diagnostic accuracy in localizing ulnar neuropathy, particularly when distal recording is not feasible because of severe muscle atrophy.

Objective: The present study aimed to establish the electrodiagnostic reference values for the ulnar nerve recorded at the FCU muscle.

Methods: A total of 73 upper extremities from 44 patients with suspected carpal tunnel syndrome underwent nerve conduction study. For the FCU muscle, the active electrode was placed 10 cm below the medial epicondyle, and the reference electrode was placed at the pisiform bone. The ulnar nerve was stimulated at the wrist, the medial epicondyle, and 10 cm proximal to the medial epicondyle. The recorded parameters included onset latency at the elbow and above the elbow, as well as CMAP amplitude, area, and duration.

Results: The mean DML and CMAP amplitude following stimulation at the medial epicondyle were 2.35 ± 0.35 ms and 8.89 ± 2.84 mV, respectively. The mean NCV across the elbow was 65.12 ± 10.28 m/s. Conclusion: The upper limit of normal for DML was 3.05 ms, and the lower limit of normal (LLN) for CMAP amplitude was 3.21 mV, both derived using the mean ± 2 SD. In contrast, the LLN for NCV across the elbow was 50.51 m/s, based on the 2.5th percentile.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

An TW, Evanoff BA, Boyer MI, Osei DA. The prevalence of cubital tunnel syndrome: A cross-sectional study in a U.S. Metropolitan Cohort. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2017; 99: 408-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.01162

Osei DA, Groves AP, Bommarito K, Ray WZ. Cubital tunnel syndrome: incidence and demographics in a National Administrative Database. Neurosurgery 2017; 80: 417-20. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyw061

Dy CJ, Mackinnon SE. Ulnar neuropathy: evaluation and management. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2016; 9: 178-84. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-016-9327-x

Palmer BA, Hughes TB. Cubital tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35: 153-63. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2009.11.004

Dumitru D, Zwarts MJ. Chapter 24 - Focal peripheral neuropathies. In: Dumitru D, Amato AA, Zwarts M, editors. Electrodiagnostic Medicine (Second Edition). Boston: Hanley & Belfus; 2002. p. 1043-126. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-56053-433-4.50032-8

Benecke R, Conrad B. The value of electrophysiological examination of the flexor carpi ulnaris muscle in the diagnosis of ulnar nerve lesions at the elbow. J Neurol 1980; 223: 207-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00313185

Felsenthal G, Brockman PS, Mondell DL, Hilton EB. Proximal forearm ulnar nerve conduction techniques. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1986; 67: 440-4.

Awang MS, Abdullah JM, Abdullah MR, Tahir A, Tharakan J, Prasad A, et al. Nerve conduction study of healthy Asian Malays: the influence of age on median, ulnar, and sural nerves. Med Sci Monit 2007; 13: CR330-2.

Fong SY, Goh KJ, Shahrizaila N, Wong KT, Tan CT. Effects of demographic and physical factors on nerve conduction study values of healthy subjects in a multi-ethnic Asian population. Muscle Nerve 2016; 54: 244-8. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.25029

Ginanneschi F, Curti S, Marinelli F, Nft AA, Cioncoloni D, Mattioli S, et al. Reference values for distal motor conduction of the tibial nerve: Effects of demographic and anthropometric measures. Muscle Nerve 2020; 62: 219-25. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.26908

Lafratta CW, Smith OH. A study of the relationship of motor nerve conduction velocity in the adult to age, sex, and handedness. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1964; 45: 407-12.

Egbuchulem KI. The basics of sample size estimation: an editor’s review. Ann Ib Postgrad Med 2023; 21: 5-10.

Chen S, Andary M, Buschbacher R, Del Toro D, Smith B, So Y, et al. Electrodiagnostic reference values for upper and lower limb nerve conduction studies in adult populations. Muscle Nerve 2016; 54: 371-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.25203

Lee WS, Yang H-J, Park SB, Son YJ, Hong N, Lee SH. Location of ulnar nerve branches to the flexor carpi ulnaris during surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2023; 66: 90-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2022.0128

Electrode placement for ulnar motor nerve conduction study recorded from the flexor carpi ulnaris (FCU) muscle

Downloads

Published

2026-09-08

How to Cite

1.
Hathaiareerug C, Pareesri H, Phongamwong C. ELECTRODIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE VALUES FOR ULNAR MOTOR NERVE CONDUCTION RECORDED FROM THE FLEXOR CARPI ULNARIS MUSCLE. J Southeast Asian Med Res [Internet]. 2026 Sep. 8 [cited 2026 Sep. 8];10:e0310. Available from: https://jseamed.org/index.php/jseamed/article/view/310

Issue

Section

Original Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.